so much for freedom of speech - Page 4

askmrjesus · 05-20-2010, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by udman

From wiki

Hermann Balck (7 December 1893 – 29 November 1982) was a general in Nazi Germany's Wehrmacht during World War II. He was also a recipient of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves, Swords and Diamonds. The Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross and its higher grade Oak Leaves, Swords and Diamonds was awarded to recognise extreme battlefield bravery or successful military leadership. His father was Generalleutnant and Knight of the Order Pour le Mérite William Balck.

Weird....

That is weird.

Oak leaves, Swords and Diamonds?

What is that? Some kind of Nazi breakfast cereal?

JC

udman · 05-20-2010, 05:31 PM

I was thinking fruit cake.

Hitler fruit cake.

pauldun170 · 05-20-2010, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Chi

Why are you guys jumping on him like that? We all post things to get the reactions of the other members of this board, this isnt any different than the 20 million other threads started.

No wonder we dont get new blood to this place...

Why not?

If he's gonna post like that then he has deal with the replies.

Anyone is subject to ridicule and finger pointing when they have a stupid post. Why should Wildchild be any different?

The original post was stupid.
The way it framed the argument was stupid.
The argument itself was stupid.

The follow up post resorted into idiot nutjob blog speak.

It's not that Wildchild is a bad person. He posted stupidity.
I'm sure there are loads of big girl panties he can put on to deal with the negativity.
Its certainly not worthy of some chick running in here crying "BUTTHURT!!!" "BUTHURT!!!"

wildchild · 05-20-2010, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Why not?

If he's gonna post like that then he has deal with the replies.

Anyone is subject to ridicule and finger pointing when they have a stupid post. Why should Wildchild be any different?

The original post was stupid.
The way it framed the argument was stupid.
The argument itself was stupid.

The follow up post resorted into idiot nutjob blog speak.

It's not that Wildchild is a bad person. He posted stupidity.
I'm sure there are loads of big girl panties he can put on to deal with the negativity.
Its certainly not worthy of some chick running in here crying "BUTTHURT!!!" "BUTHURT!!!"

the truly funny part is you post so self rightously proclaiming your victory in these type of discussions on a regular basis. it's really not that anyone thinks you are superior in these thoughts they simply grow tired of reading your very predictable responses. anyone posting a negative thought about XXX gets the same "oh you posted stupidly" response from you.
no big deal really.

goof2 · 05-20-2010, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Chi

Why are you guys jumping on him like that? We all post things to get the reactions of the other members of this board, this isnt any different than the 20 million other threads started.

No wonder we dont get new blood to this place...

I wasn't trying to be harsh, I just don't like the nickname thing. I wanted to point out that it is counterproductive for someone to start a discussion and then neuter anything they may say by using a stupid nickname just to get some visceral satisfaction.

Rangerscott · 05-20-2010, 07:50 PM

O hell. It's racist now. I bet that african american lady wouldn't have said something if it was Bush Jr.

pauldun170 · 05-20-2010, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wildchild

the truly funny part is you post so self rightously proclaiming your victory in these type of discussions on a regular basis. it's really not that anyone thinks you are superior in these thoughts they simply grow tired of reading your very predictable responses. anyone posting a negative thought about XXX gets the same "oh you posted stupidly" response from you.
no big deal really.

Yup...I do it all the time. You are absolutely correct.

Especially with post related to constitutional ickiness.

101lifts2 · 05-21-2010, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nhgunnut

Unless a direct threat was made against the President it is an example of free speech. Burning or Hanging in Effigy is as old as Politics. There were COUNTLESS hangings in effigy of Bush. No one whined about about what was the motivation for it it He was a lousy president and the motivation seemed obvious. Same here, someone believes that Obama is a lousy president they burned him in effigy. Just because he is balck he doesn't get special treatment.

Agree 100%. While I think it is very disrespectful to the presidency of this country, it is still free speech w/o any type of threat.

wildchild · 05-21-2010, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170

constitutional ickiness.

thank you for my morning laugh sir. I have to find a way to use that term. LOL

The promised update to this original story.

Secret Service has concluded their investigation and found no reason for charges. Now the local PD is investigating the bartender at the request of the local NAACP, looking for possible racial motive. That is the one thing I don't like about our new leader. Apparently you can't simply dislike him. You either like him or you're a racist.

05-20-2010, 05:31 PM	#32
udman You are not the Man!! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Austin TX Moto: Hawk GT Posts: 750	I was thinking fruit cake. Hitler fruit cake. __________________ You can put lipstick on a VS Forum, but it's still a VS Forum...

05-20-2010, 07:50 PM	#36
Rangerscott Viff6N Mutated Warrior Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Texas Moto: '01 Honda VFR 800 & '09 ER-6N Posts: 8,704	O hell. It's racist now. I bet that african american lady wouldn't have said something if it was Bush Jr.