Swat raids gone bad...in pretty colors - Page 3

pdog · 05-26-2010, 12:16 PM

Prohibition does not work. More Americans use marijuana, percentage-wise, than Dutch. Conservatives complain about the nanny state yet your first sentence is the essence of the nanny state.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

Do you think people can handle drugs if we legalized them? Or better yet, will the taxes outweigh the money transfer from the war on drugs?

I hate promoting shit that people become dependant upon.

Avatard · 05-26-2010, 12:21 PM

Perfectly articulated.

askmrjesus · 05-26-2010, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Even if they can't handle it, who cares if people harm their health by choice? They're inferior people anyway. I'm more concerned with what happens to people who make intelligent choices.

Inferior?

I smoke pot.

You're bald.

I win.

JC

Homeslice · 05-26-2010, 04:59 PM

Reading comprehension.....I said "people who harm their health" (i.e. become addicted or use the hard stuff)

askmrjesus · 05-26-2010, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Reading comprehension.....I said "people who harm their health" (i.e. become addicted or use the hard stuff)

So....what, you're not bald now?

JC

tommymac · 05-26-2010, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Reading comprehension.....I said "people who harm their health" (i.e. become addicted or use the hard stuff)

By legalizing it they will then be able ot sue the producers because,of course its thier fault they became addicted and destroyed their lives.

Homeslice · 05-26-2010, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommymac

By legalizing it they will then be able ot sue the producers because,of course its thier fault they became addicted and destroyed their lives.

Have any such lawsuits been successful against alcohol or tobacco companies? I don't know either way, I'm just asking.

dubbs · 05-26-2010, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tommymac

By legalizing it they will then be able ot sue the producers because,of course its thier fault they became addicted and destroyed their lives.

Like cigarettes?

I think that only happened because they lied about it's affects. If the companies are up front and put warnings on the labels, i don't see them getting sued.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Have any such lawsuits been successful against alcohol or tobacco companies? I don't know either way, I'm just asking.

Tobacco, yes, because they swore up and down that their product wasn't addictive.

tommymac · 05-26-2010, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Have any such lawsuits been successful against alcohol or tobacco companies? I don't know either way, I'm just asking.

Not sure about alcohol but there was the big one against the tobacco companies.

Would be funny if all these idiots just sued the cartels instead and they sent their "legal" teams to settle the matter

Kaneman · 05-27-2010, 02:18 PM

Wait a minute....Homeslice is bald??

05-26-2010, 12:21 PM	#22
Avatard Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Here to integrity Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja Posts: 7,482	Perfectly articulated. __________________ Insert free thought here.

05-27-2010, 02:18 PM	#30
Kaneman AMA Supersport Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Odessa, TX Moto: 2000 Honda CBR1100XX Blackbird Posts: 4,931	Wait a minute....Homeslice is bald?? __________________ 1982 Honda XR80 - blown motor, 1993 Kawasaki ZX6D - sold, 2001 Suzuki Bandit 1200S - sold, 1984 Honda Magna - sold, 2001 Kawasaki ZRX1200R - blown motor, 2007 Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom - totalled, 2003 Yamaha FZ1 - sold, 1994 Honda Magna - sold, 2001 Honda CBR600F4i - sold, 1998 Suzuki DR350 - stolen, 1989 Honda Super Magna - sold, 2007 Yamaha Stratoliner, 2000 Honda CBR 1100XX Blackbird

05-26-2010, 04:59 PM	#24
Homeslice Elitist Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: SF Bay Area Moto: Gix 750 Posts: 11,351	Reading comprehension.....I said "people who harm their health" (i.e. become addicted or use the hard stuff)