You see a beautiful car parked away from all the other vehicles..

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Someone would have to be pretty weak-minded if they felt "maliced" or "anguished" because Tmall parked next to them in the back of the lot. He isn't going to be the type of person who would ding their door.

"Yeah, let's go way out to the back of the lot and ding this guy's door, and then better yet, let's remain here so that he knows who did it".........Yeah that makes sense.

So what is there to be afraid of? It's just a joke. Or is there something else other than your car that you're trying to protect?

Uhuh...A "joke" is rarely funny to the victim. Look, the actual outcome is not the point, it is his admitted intent to do "harm" that defines it as a malicious act. Let me "dumb this down" for you. If you do something with the intent of causing a negative reaction, however slight, it is malice. Pure and simple. Hoe the other person reacts isn't Germain to the discussion. You all can justify this any way you wish but the bottom line is that you are doing it with malicious intent.

Apparently, there are two types of people om this forum, those that care about their vehicles, worked hard for them and would like to keep them nice and those that don't care about their vehicles, scorn those that do and endeavor to prevent them from fully enjoying their vehicles. Quite frankly, I don't see what harm "skinny white boys" are doing to you by lining up their cars and showing them off. I see that kind of thing around here all the time. Except it crosses all age, gender and race boundaries here. There were a bunch of older white guys with older American cars parked on the lot last Summer. Good thing you weren't around to ruin it for them.

[Homeslice]

Originally Posted by Amber Lamps

Uhuh...A "joke" is rarely funny to the victim. Look, the actual outcome is not the point, it is his admitted intent to do "harm" that defines it as a malicious act. Let me "dumb this down" for you. If you do something with the intent of causing a negative reaction, however slight, it is malice. Pure and simple. Hoe the other person reacts isn't Germain to the discussion. You all can justify this any way you wish but the bottom line is that you are doing it with malicious intent.
.

The actual outcome isn't important? So, the fact that nobody's car got dinged isn't important?

If I owned a Porsche or something and parked it way out there, and then later after I came out the store I saw a beater parked next to me, I would (or should) think it's funny. If for some reason I got offended, maybe it's a sign that I should lighten up.

If nobody were allowed to "commit malice" or whatever you want to call it, then nobody would learn any life lessons. For example, when other kids made fun of you in school, it taught you to either A) grow a pair and retaliate, or B) grow a pair and stop taking shit personally. Either choice requires growing a pair and getting some self-esteem.

When people feel offended, 90% of the time it's their own doing and their own choice.

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

The actual outcome isn't important? So, the fact that nobody's car got dinged isn't important?

If I owned a Porsche or something and parked it way out there, and then later after I came out the store I saw a beater parked next to me, I would (or should) think it's funny. If for some reason I got offended, maybe it's a sign that I should lighten up.

If nobody were allowed to "commit malice" or whatever you want to call it, then nobody would learn any life lessons. For example, when other kids made fun of you in school, it taught you to either A) grow a pair and retaliate, or B) grow a pair and stop taking shit personally. Either choice requires growing a pair and getting some self-esteem.

When people feel offended, 90% of the time it's their own doing and their own choice.

No, no, no little one the outcome is irrelevant because it is your intent to do harm that defines the term. If I take a gun, point it at you and fire, I am committing a malicious act whether or not I actually hit you. Your stated purpose was to cause these "skinny, white boys" emotional duress, it doesn't matter whether they laugh, cry or kick your ass. YOUR intent remains the same.

BTW as far as "learning life lessons" go, I'm not sure why you and your ilk have taken it upon yourselves to go out of your way to teach the rest of us character lessons but you can go ahead and take me out of your class roster.

[Tmall]

Originally Posted by Amber Lamps

No, no, no little one the outcome is irrelevant because it is your intent to do harm that defines the term. If I take a gun, point it at you and fire, I am committing a malicious act whether or not I actually hit you. Your stated purpose was to cause these "skinny, white boys emotional duress, it doesn't matter whether they laugh, cry or kick your ass. YOUR intent remains the same.

You've past arguing for arguing sake and are now starting to sound like an idiot.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

The actual outcome isn't important? So, the fact that nobody's car got dinged isn't important?

If I owned a Porsche or something and parked it way out there, and then later after I came out the store I saw a beater parked next to me, I would (or should) think it's funny. If for some reason I got offended, maybe it's a sign that I should lighten up....

Still funny if your Porsche had a door ding that you couldn't prove was the done by the car next to you?

...If nobody were allowed to "commit malice" or whatever you want to call it, then nobody would learn any life lessons. For example, when other kids made fun of you in school, it taught you to either A) grow a pair and retaliate, or B) grow a pair and stop taking shit personally. Either choice requires growing a pair and getting some self-esteem.

When people feel offended, 90% of the time it's their own doing and their own choice.

I believe the whole point to Amber's stance is such that why one would care where others park unless they have self esteem, anger or jealously issues.

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

Still funny if your Porsche had a door ding that you couldn't prove was the done by the car next to you?



I believe the whole point to Amber's stance is such that why one would care where others park unless they have self esteem, anger or jealously issues.

Yea he'd smile until he got home and found that ding....

Exactly my point, who's the asshole, the guy parking his vehicle out in the back to protect it or the guys going out of their way to fuck with them? The original tone of this thread suggested that it was the former.

[azoomm]

I'm now going to park out farther just to make malicious people walk farther than before.

[tommymac]

Originally Posted by azoomm

I'm now going to park out farther just to make malicious people walk farther than before.

Now whos showing mallice

[Amber Lamps]

Originally Posted by tommymac

Now whos showing mallice

Yea, she's going to force these assholes to dip into their crack fund to buy shoes from walking farther.

[tommymac]

Originally Posted by Amber Lamps

Yea, she's going to force these assholes to dip into their crack fund to buy shoes from walking farther.

Well at least theyre at the mall already so they can buy new shoes