Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Cage Hell

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2011, 05:36 AM   #1
101lifts2
WSB Champion
 
101lifts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Moto: 2009 Kawi ZX6R
Posts: 5,570
Default 2013 Chevy Cruze 2.0L Turbo Diesel for U.S.

http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/21/r...irmed-for-u-s/

I can confirm this...
__________________
Train Hard

Ron Paul - 2012

Mark of Excellence
GM

Last edited by 101lifts2; 03-20-2011 at 05:41 AM..
101lifts2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 06:09 AM   #2
Mikey
Raving Lunatic
 
Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Moto: Concours 14 ABS, ZX6E
Posts: 902
Default

That's a good start, but where's my diesel-powered half-ton pickup?
__________________
Slow is smooth, smooth is fast.
Mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:55 PM   #3
'73 H1 Triple
restorer of the original
 
'73 H1 Triple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zionsville,PA
Moto: '93 ZR1100 &'73 Kawasaki H1 500
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikey View Post
That's a good start, but where's my diesel-powered half-ton pickup?
GM had one close to being offered but when obutthead took over GM, it was scrapped/tabled.
'73 H1 Triple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 01:07 PM   #4
derf
token jewboy
 
derf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
Default

How come GM has a diesle that gets 34mpg, while the VW diesles are advertising 10mpg more and getting in the 50's mpg?

Add to that the general cheaponess of GM cars and you see why the US auto industry is crap

I also thought that the cruz was gonna be disconinued in favor of another crappy small model?
__________________
derf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 03:07 PM   #5
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derf View Post
How come GM has a diesle that gets 34mpg, while the VW diesles are advertising 10mpg more and getting in the 50's mpg?

Add to that the general cheaponess of GM cars and you see why the US auto industry is crap

I also thought that the cruz was gonna be disconinued in favor of another crappy small model?
Because VWs aren't advertising 10mpg more. Both the Golf and Jetta diesels have the same 34mpg combined that Chevy is claiming.
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 03:55 PM   #6
derf
token jewboy
 
derf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goof2 View Post
Because VWs aren't advertising 10mpg more. Both the Golf and Jetta diesels have the same 34mpg combined that Chevy is claiming.
Sorry, 8mpg more not 10

__________________
derf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 04:04 PM   #7
Mikey
Raving Lunatic
 
Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Moto: Concours 14 ABS, ZX6E
Posts: 902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by '73 H1 Triple View Post
GM had one close to being offered but when obutthead took over GM, it was scrapped/tabled.
Yeah, and it was a great setup from what I understand. Unfortunately, even before the project was killed, it would have been unsuccessful because the diesel was going to add something like $8K iirc to the price of a truck, which makes it cost-prohibitive.

I do know I've seen turbodiesel Ford Rangers in Europe and the Middle East, so I know it can be done and cheap. I'm sure the EPA is fucking us, but I'm fairly certain that what I want could be done here if a manufacturer really wanted to do it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by derf View Post
Sorry, 8mpg more not 10

There's a difference between highway mileage and mixed mileage.
__________________
Slow is smooth, smooth is fast.
Mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 10:30 AM   #8
Captain Morgan
Let's do another U-turn
 
Captain Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana
Moto: 2009 V-Strom
Posts: 3,816
Default

What is the benefit to having diesel, when diesel fuel is more expensive than unleaded? They're talking about 34mpg, but for that size of vehicle, 34mpg is pretty standard, isn't it? So, why would you want a 34mpg diesel when you can have a 34mpg unleaded, which is cheaper fuel?
Captain Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 10:36 AM   #9
Particle Man
Custom User Title
 
Particle Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Morgan View Post
What is the benefit to having diesel, when diesel fuel is more expensive than unleaded? They're talking about 34mpg, but for that size of vehicle, 34mpg is pretty standard, isn't it? So, why would you want a 34mpg diesel when you can have a 34mpg unleaded, which is cheaper fuel?
Longer lasting engine.
__________________
I'm not "fat."
I'm "Enlarged to show texture."


Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away.
Particle Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 10:41 AM   #10
Tmall
Aspiring Rapper
 
Tmall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Moto: '12 CB1000R
Posts: 3,569
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle Man View Post
Longer lasting engine.
Which will cost a good bit more and should require more maintenance...
Tmall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.