She can cheer anytime...

[Frostz28]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Americans like to view themselves as macho cowboys,

That's because we are! LOL

[zed]

there is a big difference between Playboy and Swank

[NONE_too_SOFT]

Originally Posted by JoshuaTree

Yes. Then again, some of the worst examples of "parenting" I've ever witnessed have come at the hands of 'god fearing, good Chrisitan' parents - both single and traditional couples.

And is it still unclear to anyone why there is a teacher shortage in this country?

Fucking invertebrate school boards and administrators.

You are stating the exception, not the rule. Theres a teacher shortage due to a lot of reasons, the baby boom being a huge factor. Alot of baby boomers are beginning to retire. The amount of early childhood education majors coming out of college in the next ten years will more than make up for it. My sister is in ECE, she's done the research.

Originally Posted by Rangerscott

Billy beats the crap out of bobby and gets a week suspension. Jill flashes a boob and she gets expelled.

O' the nation of where blood is tolerable but nudity is the devil.

Can u cite an example here, or are do u just imagine it this way? I dont see anything wrong with protecting a child's innocence. Physically kids may be able to procreate in their early teens, but mentally they certainly are not able to handle the emotional effects of sex, and i believe its our responsibility to prepare them for that as much as possible.

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Pretty much. Americans like to view themselves as macho cowboys, so they turn a blind eye to all the violence on TV and video games, yet they bitch and moan about nudity because they're attention whores who get all butt-hurt when someone with a better body gets more attention than they do.

YeeeeeeHaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww bitch.

go read a newspaper.

[Tmall]

Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT

So you're part of the "i only buy it to read the articles" crowd? please, playboys were meant to be fap'd to, cause its porn. Just because porn has gotten more vivid and graphic does not make playboy any less porn.




Ur analogy makes absolutely no sense. Posing for a multi million mass publicized magazine and sending a single text message are two different things.

I dont understand how you guys dont see that its wrong that she is posing for porn and teaching children. Thats what it boils down to. I dont have a problem with people flaunting their goods, but the people i would want teaching my children about life would not be those whose priorities lie somewhere between teaching cheerleading and posing for pornography. I would never want my daughter to think that it is okay to pose for playboy.

Shit, i love looking at hot chicks, but i've never seen a stripper or porn star that i've ever considered to be in the right frame of mind to teach children.

Negative ghost rider, that pattern is full...

Naked women do not equal porn. Naked women with cocks or tongues in them equal porn.

Go to any museum and tell them they have porn hanging on their walls, and they'll laugh you out of there pretty quickly.

[Particle Man]

Originally Posted by askmrjesus

Dude, she's a CHEERLEADING TEACHER! Cheerleading is nothing more than organized sports porn, so who do you want to teach it, a Mormon granny?

JC

insert **scene from "The Replacements" of the cheerleaders smacking eachother on the ass** here

[Smittie61984]

Originally Posted by Particle Man

insert **scene from "The Replacements" of the cheerleaders smacking eachother on the ass** here

Hellz yeah!!! I remember in highschool our cheerleaders got into trouble for lap dancing during practice because the principle saw it on security camera.

But this reminds me of a dancer recital that was down by a local Atlanta school in Clayton county which is the 1st school system to loose accreditation in I think 50years...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANjceFBmauo

I'm also guessing that all these teen girl pics from myspace, facebook, texting, flickr, photobucket, etc probably make playboy look like a family portrait with grandma. I personally hate Playboy because it's nothing but words with some pictures in it. I rather look at a hooters calender and I hate Hooters because it's nothing but a PG strip club.

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT

So you're part of the "i only buy it to read the articles" crowd? please, playboys were meant to be fap'd to, cause its porn. Just because porn has gotten more vivid and graphic does not make playboy any less porn.




Ur analogy makes absolutely no sense. Posing for a multi million mass publicized magazine and sending a single text message are two different things.

I dont understand how you guys dont see that its wrong that she is posing for porn and teaching children. Thats what it boils down to. I dont have a problem with people flaunting their goods, but the people i would want teaching my children about life would not be those whose priorities lie somewhere between teaching cheerleading and posing for pornography. I would never want my daughter to think that it is okay to pose for playboy.

Shit, i love looking at hot chicks, but i've never seen a stripper or porn star that i've ever considered to be in the right frame of mind to teach children.

Of all the people that have hurt kids in the schools, I haven't heard of one of them posing nude in Playboy or any other nude magazine. So that tells me that posing nude doesn't make you a bad person.

And it can be more then a text message. There are many people that pose nude online. Or lose a cell phone and have a nude picture posted by the person who found it.

You would be surprised with how many people you meet in the run of the day that have posed nude at one time or another.

James

[Flexin]

Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT

You are stating the exception, not the rule. Theres a teacher shortage due to a lot of reasons, the baby boom being a huge factor. Alot of baby boomers are beginning to retire. The amount of early childhood education majors coming out of college in the next ten years will more than make up for it. My sister is in ECE, she's done the research.



Can u cite an example here, or are do u just imagine it this way? I dont see anything wrong with protecting a child's innocence. Physically kids may be able to procreate in their early teens, but mentally they certainly are not able to handle the emotional effects of sex, and i believe its our responsibility to prepare them for that as much as possible.



YeeeeeeHaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww bitch.

go read a newspaper.

Do you realize that there are kids in their early teens that are giving blow jobs to other kids just outside the school? Do you realize that there is a really good chance that none of the teachers in that school posed for Playboy?

Just like someone else said, a good teacher is a good teacher. Thats what makes a difference.

They are not really teaching about life in school. They are teaching what was set by the school board. I'll teach my kids about life. I will raise my kids with my wife and the rest of my family.

I want the teachers to teach the subjects they are paid to do.

James

[skiergirl]

The bottom line is really just that if you want to be a teacher of any kind then be prepared to live your life in a certain way. There are higher expectations for that job than others and if you aren't willing to conform than it's not the right job for you. In a round-a-bout way you are flaunting/selling your body and that bothers some people.

I think she's beautiful and have no problem with her Playboy pics.

[NONE_too_SOFT]

Originally Posted by Tmall

Negative ghost rider, that pattern is full...

Naked women do not equal porn. Naked women with cocks or tongues in them equal porn.

Go to any museum and tell them they have porn hanging on their walls, and they'll laugh you out of there pretty quickly.

playboy is on the same level as art in a museum? cause the only people i see people wailin' in the museum are homeless people.