Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2010, 12:21 PM   #21
azoomm
moderator chick

 
azoomm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hill Country TX
Moto: Pasta Rockets
Posts: 8,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
i know exactly why. it had piss poor range, couldnt carry shit, and had limited charging options.
Of course....

and when the techology was purchased the continued development was stopped. You don't find that curious?

I'm just frustrated by the ignorance. My friends calling to boycott BP, the public that just freaks out on reaction, all of it. Knee-jerk is the WORST. No one wants it in their back yard, so they went somewhere else. I told y'all it would take months - that was my husband's estimate. Look at that, months...
__________________
We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "smart"?

Come Play at the Track!!

http://www.elitetrackdays.com
azoomm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 12:30 PM   #22
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azoomm View Post
Of course....

and when the techology was purchased the continued development was stopped. You don't find that curious?

I'm just frustrated by the ignorance. My friends calling to boycott BP, the public that just freaks out on reaction, all of it. Knee-jerk is the WORST. No one wants it in their back yard, so they went somewhere else. I told y'all it would take months - that was my husband's estimate. Look at that, months...
big oil's intent was most likely exactly what you think, however isint it far more likely that gm independantly decided that the car was not at that time viable/profitable and acted in its best interests to recoup losses and limit their liability?

im actually counting on morons pulling that, cant wait for local stations to cut prices
__________________
TWF Post whore #6
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 12:35 PM   #23
Sean
giggity
 
Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: socal
Moto: street, sumo & dirty
Posts: 1,071
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azoomm View Post
Of course....

and when the techology was purchased the continued development was stopped. You don't find that curious?
California dropped their ZEV mandate.
Sean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 12:40 PM   #24
azoomm
moderator chick

 
azoomm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hill Country TX
Moto: Pasta Rockets
Posts: 8,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
big oil's intent was most likely exactly what you think, however isint it far more likely that gm independantly decided that the car was not at that time viable/profitable and acted in its best interests to recoup losses and limit their liability?

im actually counting on morons pulling that, cant wait for local stations to cut prices
Oh, I don't like tinfoil hats. I'm not a fan and don't look good in them I just find it really curious.

It was only introduced in LA. And then, the reason cited by GM was "lack of consumer interest." Even when EVERY driver that had one wanted to purchase and formed a coilition to stop the destruction of the cars. They offered GM more than retail in one big check for the remaining cars - to be turned down. All the cars were taken to GM's test track and crushed [where they still remain].

Back to the thread topic. I'm sad this happened to BP. It's part of the law of averages and something was BOUND to happen. They are the largest offshore agency in the world - if someone was going to have something happen, it would be them. It's also curious to me that Schlumberger and TransOcean aren't anywhere in the news.....
__________________
We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "smart"?

Come Play at the Track!!

http://www.elitetrackdays.com
azoomm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 12:50 PM   #25
Sean
giggity
 
Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: socal
Moto: street, sumo & dirty
Posts: 1,071
Default

I see TransOcean all over the news. It was the "TransOcean rig owned by BP" for a while at the beginning.
Sean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 02:05 PM   #26
Flexin
AMA Supersport
 
Flexin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azoomm View Post
Oh, I don't like tinfoil hats. I'm not a fan and don't look good in them I just find it really curious.

It was only introduced in LA. And then, the reason cited by GM was "lack of consumer interest." Even when EVERY driver that had one wanted to purchase and formed a coilition to stop the destruction of the cars. They offered GM more than retail in one big check for the remaining cars - to be turned down. All the cars were taken to GM's test track and crushed [where they still remain].

Back to the thread topic. I'm sad this happened to BP. It's part of the law of averages and something was BOUND to happen. They are the largest offshore agency in the world - if someone was going to have something happen, it would be them. It's also curious to me that Schlumberger and TransOcean aren't anywhere in the news.....
There is still one left but I think its just the body. I thing the engine, battery and so on were removed.

James
__________________
"Bust a nut inside your eye, to show you where I come from"
"f youre horny, lets do it, Ride it, my pony, My saddles waitin, Come and jump on it, If youre horny, lets do it"
"I'm not a playa I just fuck a lot"
"Round two, I'm down to Do, what it takes to make you
Understand I'm the Candyman And I melt in your mouth, not in your hands Hard as rock, yes I'm no sucka The boots I knock make me one bad mutha"
Flexin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 05:00 PM   #27
Dave
Chaotic Neutral
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azoomm View Post
Oh, I don't like tinfoil hats. I'm not a fan and don't look good in them I just find it really curious.

It was only introduced in LA. And then, the reason cited by GM was "lack of consumer interest." Even when EVERY driver that had one wanted to purchase and formed a coilition to stop the destruction of the cars. They offered GM more than retail in one big check for the remaining cars - to be turned down. All the cars were taken to GM's test track and crushed [where they still remain].

Back to the thread topic. I'm sad this happened to BP. It's part of the law of averages and something was BOUND to happen. They are the largest offshore agency in the world - if someone was going to have something happen, it would be them. It's also curious to me that Schlumberger and TransOcean aren't anywhere in the news.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean View Post
I see TransOcean all over the news. It was the "TransOcean rig owned by BP" for a while at the beginning.
isint it a transocean rig leased by bp?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flexin View Post
There is still one left but I think its just the body. I thing the engine, battery and so on were removed.

James
there were a lot more than one survivor, a handful got handed to museums and at least one was restored to driveable status. i understand gm was rather upset about that but so would i if i was concerned id have to continue making parts for a car that cost 80 grand each to build
__________________
TWF Post whore #6
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 07:06 PM   #28
Rangerscott
Viff6N Mutated Warrior
 
Rangerscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Moto: '01 Honda VFR 800 & '09 ER-6N
Posts: 8,704
Default

When you've lived in the city that produces the most oil in Texas,.........................makes you wanna fucking own one of those companies. LOL


Wish I could find that funny clip of oil being like crack.
Rangerscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 08:19 PM   #29
pdog
Refugee
 
pdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Moto: Pimped 2005 SV650
Posts: 332
Default

To be precise, pumping of existing wells is still happening. Exploratory drilling for new wells has been halted.
pdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:14 PM   #30
azoomm
moderator chick

 
azoomm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hill Country TX
Moto: Pasta Rockets
Posts: 8,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdog View Post
To be precise, pumping of existing wells is still happening. Exploratory drilling for new wells has been halted.
I did say drilling, right?

/looks up/ Yup, all drilling. Because drilling is the "dangerous" part.
__________________
We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "smart"?

Come Play at the Track!!

http://www.elitetrackdays.com
azoomm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.