12-16-2010, 05:15 PM | #31 |
South of Heaven
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Moto: 2006 Yamaha R1 50th Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1,491
|
flash is definitely high on my list.. it is amazing what you can do with a good flash and using it indirect (fill flash).. If your thinking revolves around not having to change lenses then scrap the idea it won't help and you will lose a lot more than you gain. Most people sell the 55-200mm to buy the 70-300mm lens to get the extra length. I was going to do this as well until I started playing around with the 55-200mm at sporting events and talking to the pros - then i decided I am going to scrap the 70-300mm idea (f/4.5-5.6) and go with a 70-200mm f/2.8 - but problem is I go from a $500 lens to a $2,100 lens. But it is well worth the extra cash. You can up the shutter speeds in zoomed shots at sporting events even in lower light conditions to freeze the action. And you can get good indoor sports / action pictures as well. Either the 55-200mm or 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 are good in good lighting and/or on a tripod but if you get in lower light or changing light conditions you will struggle with blur and lower shutter speeds.
__________________
Mudpuppy Redline Superbike http://www.redlinesuperbike.com/ Learn about photography: ATP Members |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
dont ask for advice then |
|
|