05-12-2008, 03:58 AM | #131 |
flyin high
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cali
Moto: 10speed huffy w/cards in the spokes
Posts: 2,318
|
|
05-12-2008, 06:09 AM | #132 |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 7,146
|
I didn't take offense, just joked back as much as anything. Stock, you really aren't too far from off, which is pretty fuckin cool for technology. I found some theoretical top speed calculator saying my bike would do 189, which is stupid fast. I know 1st gear does 83ish.
|
05-12-2008, 09:15 AM | #133 | |
⎷⎛⎝ ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ⎷⎛⎝
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ⎷⎛⎝ ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ⎷⎛⎝
Moto: ⎷⎛⎝ ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ⎷⎛⎝
Posts: 990
|
Quote:
The fueling is perfect and progressive so I haven't been motivated to get a custom map.
__________________
|
|
05-12-2008, 10:28 AM | #134 | |
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
I concur. Although I'm partial to the 1203cc Vtwin.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
05-12-2008, 02:56 PM | #135 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
You guys are funny! I almost bought the '07 GSXR750 because it had the same hp as my '03 GSXR1000. I remember when I had my YZF1000 (130 hp btw)and all the mags were including the GSXR750 in the liter class comparos and it was holding it's own. I know you all hate GSXRs but as a point. For most years,all the GSXRs are basically the same bike,same basic frame,swingarm,ergos,etc. So to say that one is "bulkier" than another is ridiculous. If I'm not mistaken,they always stay within a few puonds of each other as well... Oh and in '97 Yamaha took a page from Suzuki's playbook and made all three of their bikes almost exactly the same between the 600,750 and 1000.
|
05-12-2008, 03:00 PM | #136 |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 7,146
|
A 750 would be great. I wish more of the bike companies made them jsut so there was more competition.
|
05-12-2008, 03:02 PM | #137 |
RIP REX
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Moto: 2008 1125R
Posts: 7,467
|
you guys are all about the quick lightweigth carvers.. so im i but you cant count a big bike as usless. after riding in a downpour thunderstorm on a two lane highway having semis go by at >60 and going through ways of water as they sprayed into my lane, my pig never as much as budged, ill take a bigger stable bike as my street ride and a 600 for track and gap runs, other then that, i love the stability of the rc, this thing is a tank and i love it
|
05-12-2008, 03:09 PM | #138 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,156
|
The 750 is the perfect bike size, and all manufacturers need to make them. Who cares if there is no AMA 750 class. A 750 on the street is the shit.
Last edited by Rider; 05-12-2008 at 04:28 PM.. |
05-12-2008, 04:22 PM | #139 |
Chopstix / \
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Akron OH
Moto: 03 CBR RR
Posts: 5,350
|
600=sexxxxx
|
05-12-2008, 07:00 PM | #140 |
I give Squids a bad name
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fly Over State
Moto: 1996 CBR600 F3 (AKA the Flying Turd)
Posts: 4,742
|
I saw a new ZX-10r get dynoed that had nothing but a Full exhaust and it put 146 to the wheel. Then another guy came in with a bone stock 2007 ZX-14 and put down 142 to the rear. Then my buddy who has everything done to his 04 Hayabusa(Before turbo and engine work) put down 136 to the rear. Done on a Factory Pro dyno if that makes a difference.
I thought the new 600s where putting around 110 to the rear and your litres around 130 or so to the rear.
__________________
lifts - R.I.P. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|