Fox News: Worst interview ever...

EpyonXero · 07-29-2013, 08:45 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY92TV4_Wc0

OneSickPsycho · 07-29-2013, 09:07 AM

Kudos to that guy for not flat out telling her that she's a fucking moron.

CasterTroy · 07-29-2013, 09:24 AM

I'm confused

Is he a PHD?!!? I don't think he ever mentioned it

azoomm · 07-29-2013, 10:34 AM

I do like his statement about being confused as to why they aren't discussing the book. But, rather the credentials of the author.

OneSickPsycho · 07-29-2013, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azoomm

I do like his statement about being confused as to why they aren't discussing the book. But, rather the credentials of the author.

They had his credentials validated within the first two minutes of the interview... the other 8 were ridiculous. I think it's a valid question to take his faith into account, but after hearing his background all I could think was, "ok, so what's the book about?"

CasterTroy · 07-29-2013, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneSickPsycho

I think it's a valid question to take his faith into account

Yeah that was a fail on HIS part....he could have addressed his conversion from Christianity and the relevance it apparently had on HIM. But then, if he HAD, that would have shown bias, so I can see why he avoided it.

Trip · 07-29-2013, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasterTroy

Yeah that was a fail on HIS part....he could have addressed his conversion from Christianity and the relevance it apparently had on HIM. But then, if he HAD, that would have shown bias, so I can see why he avoided it.

Everyone has an agenda, it doesn't matter how much education you have on the subject. Personal bias will always be in play if you are human. All education does is making you have more believeable bullshit.

EpyonXero · 07-29-2013, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip

Everyone has an agenda, it doesn't matter how much education you have on the subject. Personal bias will always be in play if you are human. All education does is making you have more believeable bullshit.

Ther first problem is that Fox News believes theres some kind of Islam/Chrisianity rivalry going on.

fasternyou929 · 07-29-2013, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip

All education does is making you have...

Quoted for irony.

Papa_Complex · 07-30-2013, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneSickPsycho

They had his credentials validated within the first two minutes of the interview... the other 8 were ridiculous. I think it's a valid question to take his faith into account, but after hearing his background all I could think was, "ok, so what's the book about?"

I think that it's also a valid question to ask why the commentary that she was quoting, that was negative about his book, only seemed to come from people who support the notion of the death and resurrection, and deification of Christ? How do you call this guy's impartiality into question by bringing up the likes of William Lane Craig?

Fox really should leave the Hannitying to Hannity and O'Brien, as they clearly have no one else who's schooled in ambush journalism.

07-29-2013, 08:45 AM	#1
EpyonXero AMA Supersport Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Redneck Riviera, FL Moto: 2003 VFR800f6 Posts: 2,531	Fox News: Worst interview ever... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY92TV4_Wc0 __________________

07-29-2013, 09:24 AM	#3
CasterTroy ................ Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NC Posts: 3,028	I'm confused Is he a PHD?!!? I don't think he ever mentioned it __________________ “Being tolerant does not mean that I share another one’s belief. But it does mean that I acknowledge another one’s right to believe, and obey, his own conscience.” Viktor Frankl

07-29-2013, 09:07 AM	#2
OneSickPsycho Ride Like an Asshole Join Date: Feb 2008 Moto: nothing... Posts: 11,254	Kudos to that guy for not flat out telling her that she's a fucking moron.

07-29-2013, 10:34 AM	#4
azoomm moderator chick Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Hill Country TX Moto: Pasta Rockets Posts: 8,917	I do like his statement about being confused as to why they aren't discussing the book. But, rather the credentials of the author.