Local computer security expert investigates police practices

[pauldun170]

Eric Rachner, a Seattle cyber security expert and one of the golf players, wasn't satisfied when the city dismissed charges against him after a possibly illegal arrest for refusing to provide identification.

Rachner discovered through sleuthing that police had withheld video-recorded evidence in his case.

Full story and video
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/418746_video.html

[Avatard]

I hope he gets a six figure settlement as well, and I hope the whole bunch of fucking cunts at the cop shop lose their jobs, starting with the arresting cops, and leading all the way up to the prosecutor.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Avatard

I hope he gets a six figure settlement as well, and I hope the whole bunch of fucking cunts at the cop shop lose their jobs, starting with the arresting cops, and leading all the way up to the prosecutor.

Why the fuck would he get anything? The guy is a punk. The picture alone makes it obvious.

The cop was called for an assault that one of his buddies was responsible for. The cop (who was rather cool during the whole thing) asked for his ID and he refused. He was obstructing IMO. It isn't like cop just randomly picked on the guy and asked for ID. He was investigating a called in assault and the cop under law can arrest him for failing to provide ID for the investigation.

I'm not a big cop lover, but lets give credit where it's due here. This is not a case of abuse, but rather some smuck that thinks he can go around drunk aiming foamy golf balls at people.

Let the 2500 bucks be a lessen IMO.

[Tmall]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

Why the fuck would he get anything? The guy is a punk. The picture alone makes it obvious.

The cop was called for an assault that one of his buddies was responsible for. The cop (who was rather cool during the whole thing) asked for his ID and he refused. He was obstructing IMO. It isn't like cop just randomly picked on the guy and asked for ID. He was investigating a called in assault and the cop under law can arrest him for failing to provide ID for the investigation.

I'm not a big cop lover, but lets give credit where it's due here. This is not a case of abuse, but rather some smuck that thinks he can go around drunk aiming foamy golf balls at people.

Let the 2500 bucks be a lessen IMO.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Tmall

Don't Hate!

[Rangerscott]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

Don't Hate!

Discriminate

[Avatard]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

This is not a case of abuse, but rather some smuck that thinks he can go around drunk aiming foamy golf balls at people.

What's a smuck? Is it anything like Yiddish for DICK? SCHMUCK?

Because I can think of a schmuck here, and it ain't the kid hittin' fucking nerf balls.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Avatard

What's a smuck? Is it anything like Yiddish for DICK? SCHMUCK?

Because I can think of a schmuck here, and it ain't the kid hittin' fucking nerf balls.

Smuck..schmuck..same difference.

Yeah the guy got what asked for...arrested that is...and it cost him 2500 to boot.

[Papa_Complex]

He should do better in court than the precedent-setter, as the force was already on notice that such behaviour wasn't sanctioned.

[was92v]

Ls6